Is it expensive to develop a headless website?

Choosing between a headless CMS and a monolithic CMS can feel like a daunting decision, especially when considering cost, time, and long-term maintenance. In this article, we’ll break down the differences, answering questions like how long it takes to develop a headless website, whether it’s worth the cost, and what maintenance looks like in the long run.

How long does it take to build a headless website compared to a monolithic one?

Monolithic CMS: faster for simpler needs

A monolithic CMS like WordPress is tightly integrated, with built-in templates and plugins that speed up the design and development process.

• Templates for faster design: Pre-designed themes allow teams to launch websites quickly, often within weeks.
• Limitations for customisation: While simple websites are fast to build, heavily customised projects take longer as developers work around the limitations of the CMS.
• Typical use case: A small business website with standard functionality can go live in 2–6 weeks.

Headless CMS: slower but scalable

A headless CMS separates the front-end and back-end, requiring custom development for the design and user experience.

• Time-intensive setup: Building a custom front-end, integrating APIs, and structuring content add time to the project. Expect timelines of several weeks to months, depending on complexity.
• Parallel workflows: Teams can work on the back-end (content) and front-end (design) simultaneously, which can streamline larger projects.
• Typical use case: A headless website for a complex e-commerce platform or multi-channel content delivery may take 8–16 weeks.

Is developing a headless website more expensive?

Monolithic CMS: affordable for basic needs

• Low upfront costs: Many monolithic CMS platforms are open-source or come with affordable hosting plans. Pre-built templates and plugins further reduce development costs.
• Hidden costs: Over time, reliance on plugins for advanced functionality can lead to compatibility issues, requiring expensive fixes.
• Best for: Small businesses with limited budgets and basic website needs.

Headless CMS: an investment for the future

• Higher initial costs: Developing a headless website is more expensive upfront due to the custom design and development involved.
• Long-term cost efficiency: Once set up, a headless CMS is easier to scale, integrate with new technologies, and adapt to evolving needs, reducing costs in the long run.
• Best for: Companies with growth plans that require multi-platform delivery or custom user experiences.

Answer: While a headless CMS is initially more expensive, the investment pays off for businesses prioritising scalability and flexibility.

Is content creation easier with a headless CMS or a monolithic CMS?

Monolithic CMS: straightforward but limited

• Integrated workflows: Content is created and published through a single interface, making it intuitive for non-technical teams.
• Template constraints: Content must fit predefined layouts, limiting creative freedom for marketing teams.

Headless CMS: flexible and reusable

• Omnichannel-ready: Content is created as modular blocks, making it easy to reuse across websites, apps, and other platforms.
• Custom workflows: Advanced systems like Sanity allow for collaborative, real-time editing, perfect for large teams.

Answer: For businesses creating content for multiple platforms, a headless CMS provides greater flexibility. For smaller, single-channel needs, a monolithic CMS is easier to use.

Is maintaining a headless website harder than a monolithic one?

Monolithic CMS: easy but limited scalability

• Centralised updates: Plugins, themes, and CMS cores can be updated from a single dashboard.
• Compatibility risks: Over time, plugin conflicts and security vulnerabilities become more common, leading to higher maintenance needs.

Headless CMS: complex but future-proof

• Decoupled updates: Front-end and back-end systems can be updated independently, reducing disruptions.
• Adaptability: Headless CMS platforms integrate seamlessly with modern tools, ensuring scalability for new technologies like IoT or mobile apps.

Answer: While headless CMS maintenance requires technical expertise, it is better suited for businesses focused on long-term growth and evolving needs.

Is a headless website worth the investment?

A monolithic CMS is best for:

• Small businesses or startups needing a fast, affordable solution.
• Basic websites or blogs with minimal content management needs.

A headless CMS is ideal for:

• Businesses planning for growth and multi-platform content delivery.
• Projects requiring custom designs or advanced interactivity.

Conclusion: For small, static websites, a monolithic CMS is the most cost-effective choice. For complex, scalable projects, a headless CMS is well worth the investment.

Why Root, Digital Agency is your trusted partner for headless website development

At Root, Digital Agency, we specialise in delivering headless CMS solutions tailored to your business goals. Whether you’re seeking a monolithic CMS for quick deployment or a headless CMS for scalability and customisation, we guide you through every step of the process.

With expertise in design, development, and maintenance, we ensure your website is built for performance and ready to grow with your needs.